The issue is, in part, racial. A couple of years ago it was reported in Michigan that our black students face suspension and expulsion at a much higher rate (22.1%) than white students do (6.2%). Michigan's gap was at that time the fifth largest gap in the country. At that time, the Michigan Board of Education called for a new look at zero-tolerance policies, because minority students are disproportionately punished.
I don't think the situation has gotten much better. This year, my child's school district was selected for special monitoring because of both the rate of suspension and the differences in suspension rates by race.
|Photo courtesy by andycoan from Flickr|
Yesterday, at Slate.com, there was the story of Atiya Haynes. Atiya was given a pocket knife with a 3.25-inch blade by her grandfather, for the purpose of protection. Atiya lives in Detroit. She accidentally left it in her purse, where it was found when her purse was spontaneously searched at a school function. Atiya has been expelled for the rest of the school year, her senior year in high school. She is being allowed to take virtual classes and graduate with her class.
In a publication of the Student Advocacy Center of Michigan, I read the story of a unnamed teen who had, at the time of writing a year ago, been expelled for bringing a paring knife to school. The student brought a knife, without thinking of it as a weapon at all, to cut an apple the student had packed to eat. The student writes, "I was suspended for a year because I like apples."
And then there's one case I know of personally, of a student expelled for bringing a kitchen knife to school for self-protection from bullying. This student was expelled for the rest of the year for possession of the knife.
In all three cases in Michigan, the students were expelled. In Jie's case, Jie was suspended. And the situations are all very different, but all involve bringing a knife to school. One knife was brought as an art tool, one as a kitchen tool, and two for self-defense. None of the students wanted to hurt someone, and none did hurt anyone with the knives.
Our "zero tolerance" policies are creating situations where we look at the knife, and not at the child. Michigan law requires a school to expel the student for carrying a weapon, except if certain conditions are met. None of these children were a threat, and all could be dealt with in other ways, if we had the ability to look at the situation and at the child, instead of feeding the school-to-prison pipeline.
In Michigan, the exceptions to expulsion for students carrying a weapon are:
(a) The object or instrument possessed by the pupil was not possessed by the pupil for use as a weapon, or for direct or indirect delivery to another person for use as a weapon.
(b) The weapon was not knowingly possessed by the pupil.
(c) The pupil did not know or have reason to know that the object or instrument possessed by the pupil constituted a dangerous weapon.
(d) The weapon was possessed by the pupil at the suggestion, request, or direction of, or with the express permission of, school or police authorities. (Source: Student Advocacy Center of Michigan)
But even when these exceptions exist, the stories of Atiya and the apple-eating student show that sometimes the expulsion happens anyway. And when you're expelled from a Michigan public school for a possession of a weapon, it's for 180 days, and it's from all Michigan public schools, and no school is required to reinstate you -- ever. In bold letters, the Student Advocacy Center of Michigan states:
We need to, as a society, rethink "zero tolerance" and "three strikes" laws. We need to rethink them when it comes to our prisons, but we also need to rethink them when it comes to our schools, and we need to stop treating children like criminals. We need to give the schools the ability to look at the situation and look at the individual child, to think about what's best for the school and what's best for the child.
In liberal religion, we often talk about how much we value education. It's time for us to recognize that this is a major way in which some children are not getting the same access to education that others are, and work to make a change.