Writing about Unitarian Universalist Theology in its social and historical context.
Subscribe to this blog
Follow by Email
Saying What We Mean....
The other day, the UUA President, the Rev. Peter Morales and the President / CEO of the UU Women's Federation, the Rev. Marti Keller released a statement on the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision. Go read it; there is not a single word in this statement I disagree with.
However, I wonder to whom it is written. It reads as though it is written to be read by Unitarian Universalists who are checking up on the UUA to make sure that it is properly focused on this issue. It reads as though it is written to be read by people who are our coalition partners who want to understand the fullness of our position as they work with us.
What I would like to see us say is something like this:
To all people, especially young people, especially young women:
You have the right to have the children you want to have, and to not to have children you don't want to have, You have the right to raise your children in safe and healthy environments, and you have the right to express your sexuality without oppression.
These rights are the cornerstones of reproductive justice, and every person, including you, should have them. They are human rights. They are bigger than just the right to choose an abortion if you are pregnant; you have a right to get appropriate health care, to receive complete and accurate information about sexuality, to express yourself sexually without coercion, violence and exploitation.
Unitarian Universalists have been fighting for your right to reproductive justice for all people for decades. Today is the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that upheld your right to choose an abortion. We celebrate that victory. We were fighting for reproductive justice before then, and have been ever since, and will continue to åas long as it needed.
If we are going to make a statement, we should make it to the people we are working for, and we should make it so it can be understood.
Unitarian Universalism backed into a type of moral reasoning based on principles when we adopted the Seven Principles.
A "principle" is a formalized abstraction. "The inherent worth and dignity of every person." The moral reasoning that follows the promotion of a principle is discerning what they principle means and how to apply it to real life situations. Because we have seven principles, we have to also reason through how this principle relates to others. (Should the first principle be first, or should the last be first.?) And finally, because principles are generalizations, they can be tested by trying to find the boundaries and the exceptions, which leads to a lot of discussions about Hitler. Did Hitler still have worth and dignity?
"Virtues", in contrast, are character traits, habitual behaviors, and a mixtures of emotions and rational thought. A virtue is a way of being human. I have my list of the virtues of liberal religion: self-possession, hon…
There has been some discussion on blogs and email lists about this poem that I read at the UUCF communion service in Portland, OR this spring. Much has been said about its content and tone. Read it for yourself.
St. Thomas Didymus
In the hot street at noon I saw him a small man gray but vivid, standing forth beyond the crowd's buzzing holding in desperate grip his shaking teethgnashing son,
and thought him my brother.
I heard him cry out, weeping and speak those words, Lord, I believe, help thou mine unbelief,
and knew him my twin:
a man whose entire being had knotted itself into the one tightdrawn question, Why, why has this child lost his childhood in suffering, why is this child who will soon be a man tormented, torn, twisted? Why is he cruelly punished who has done nothing except be born?
The twin of my birth was not so close as that man I heard say what my heart sighed with each beat, my breath silently cried in and out, in and o…
“We, the member congregations of the Unitarian Universalist Association, covenant to affirm and promote: journeying toward spiritual wholeness by working to build a diverse multicultural Beloved Community by our actions that accountably dismantle racism and other oppressions in ourselves and our institutions.”
The Eighth Principle brings to the level of our Principles the commitment to anti-racism, anti-oppression, and multiculturalism that we first declared in a Resolution of Immediate Witness in 1994, and further as a Business Resolution in 1997.
The Principles are the statement of our common theology, which, by our many previous commitments, is necessarily a public theology. (As soon as the UU's began to say "Deeds, not Creeds" to describe our theological approach, we withdrew, as a body, from a common approach to the categories of traditional systematic theology.) Unitarian Universalist hold many diverse theological perspectives…
There was a Great Reformation of Unitarian Universalism beginning in the early 1970's. In my previous post, I ascribed this to the empowerment of women as both professional religious leaders and in lay leadership in congregations. I think that my view would be widely supported.
I want to complicate the question from three directions.
One is to ask about the relationship between that development and the Black Empowerment Controversy that preceded it in time.
Looking back to this history through the lens of intersectionality, we should not so easily separate the black rebellion against white racism in the UUA from the women's rebellion against patriarchy in the UUA. These may look like two different movements but they were struggling against a single entity, a white supremacist patriarchy, the generations of white men who owned and controlled the institutions of liberal religion. Who were the black women in those struggles and how did they see the UUA at the time? How would our…
I was honored to be invited by Rev. George Kimmich Beach to respond to his lecture at the 16th Annual conference of the James Luther Adams Foundation. His topic was "What is Past is Prologue: James Luther Adams and Unitarian Universalism." Dr. Michael Hogue, of Meadville-Lombard Theological School also responded to his essay. I understand that all of these works will be gathered up and published at some point. But in the meantime, here is my response, not as it was given, and not as it was planned, but as I now would have liked to have delivered it.
If there is anything that I take
from James Luther Adams, it is the necessity of a lively historical
awareness. Not only the knowledge
of previous history, but also an awareness of this present moment as the
product of that history. And more,
this present moment is also a valve moment; a moment through which the past enters into the future. How do we, standing here, tonight,
understand the historical currents that have bro…